Carbon border adjustment mechanisms (CBAMs) are policy tools that aim to address the problem of carbon leakage, which occurs when emissions-intensive industries relocate to countries with weaker climate policies in order to avoid carbon costs. CBAMs are intended to level the playing field for domestic industries by placing a carbon border tax on imported goods from countries without equivalent carbon pricing.
There are several different designs for CBAMs, but they generally involve assessing a carbon price on imported goods based on the emissions associated with their production. The carbon price would be equivalent to the domestic carbon price or emissions trading system (ETS) price. For example, if a country has a carbon price of $50 per tonne of CO2, an imported product with emissions of 100 tonnes of CO2 would be subject to a carbon border tax of $5,000.
Some of the common CBAM designs are as follows:
1. Specific border adjustment: This design involves applying a specific carbon tax on imported goods based on the emissions associated with their production. The tax would be equivalent to the domestic carbon price or ETS price. Example: A country with a domestic carbon price of $50 per tonne of CO2 applies a specific border tax on imported goods equal to $50 per tonne of CO2 emissions associated with their production. For example, if an imported product has emissions of 100 tonnes of CO2, it would be subject to a border tax of $5,000.
2. Ad valorem border adjustment: This design involves applying a border tax as a percentage of the value of imported goods. The tax would be equivalent to the domestic carbon price or ETS price.
Example: A country with a domestic carbon price of $50 per tonne of CO2 applies a border tax of 2% on the value of imported goods. For example, if an imported product has a value of $10,000, it would be subject to a border tax of $200.
3. Sectoral approach: This design involves applying a border tax on specific sectors or products that are particularly emissions-intensive. The tax would be equivalent to the domestic carbon price or ETS price.
Example: A country applies a border tax on imported goods from sectors that are particularly emissions-intensive, such as cement, steel, and aluminum. The tax would be equivalent to the domestic carbon price or ETS price.
4. Product-specific approach: This design involves applying a border tax on specific products that are particularly emissions-intensive. The tax would be equivalent to the domestic carbon price or ETS price.
Example: A country applies a border tax on specific products that are particularly emissions-intensive, such as coal, oil, and gas. The tax would be equivalent to the domestic carbon price or ETS price.
5. Input-output based approach: This design involves assessing the emissions associated with the entire production process of a product, including the emissions associated with the inputs used in production. The tax would be equivalent to the domestic carbon price or ETS price.
Example: A country applies a border tax on imported goods based on the emissions associated with the entire production process, including the emissions associated with the inputs used in production. For example, a product that has a large embodied carbon in its inputs will be subject to a higher border tax.
6. Hybrid approach: This design involves combining elements of different designs, such as a specific border adjustment and a sectoral approach, to create a more targeted and nuanced policy.
Example: A country applies a combination of different designs, such as a specific border adjustment and a sectoral approach. For example, a country applies a specific border tax of $50 per tonne of CO2 on imported goods from sectors that are particularly emissions-intensive, such as cement, steel, and aluminum.
One of the main advantages of CBAMs is that they help to prevent carbon leakage by ensuring that domestic industries are not at a competitive disadvantage to foreign competitors. This can help to maintain jobs and economic activity within a country, while also encouraging other countries to implement stronger climate policies.
CBAMs can also help to raise revenue for government, which can be used to support climate mitigation and adaptation efforts. Additionally, CBAMs can be designed to be revenue neutral, which means that the revenue generated from the carbon border tax can be used to offset other taxes or to support domestic industries that are affected by the carbon border tax.
However, CBAMs also have some potential drawbacks. One concern is that they could lead to trade disputes and retaliation from other countries. Additionally, CBAMs may disproportionately affect developing countries, as they often have weaker climate policies and may not have the same capacity to implement carbon pricing.
CBAM in European Union
The European Union (EU) has not yet implemented a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), but it has proposed a design for a CBAM as part of its Green Deal and efforts to achieve climate neutrality by 2050. The EU's proposed design is a hybrid approach that combines elements of different designs, such as a specific border adjustment and a sectoral approach.
The EU's proposed CBAM would apply a border carbon adjustment (BCA) on imported products from sectors that are particularly emissions-intensive and have a high risk of carbon leakage. The BCA would be applied on products that are covered by the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) and that are not subject to an equivalent carbon pricing in their country of origin. The BCA would be calculated based on the carbon footprint of the product, taking into account the emissions associated with the entire production process, including the emissions associated with the inputs used in production.
The EU's proposed CBAM also includes a "carbon leakage list" that identifies sectors that are particularly exposed to carbon leakage and a "competitiveness safeguard" mechanism that would ensure that the BCA does not lead to significant negative impacts on the competitiveness of EU industry.
CBAM: A Game Theory Perspective
EU's proposed CBAM can be seen as a "strategy" or "move" in a game between the EU and other countries, particularly those that do not have a similar carbon pricing system in place. From the EU's perspective, the CBAM is a way to level the playing field for domestic producers by placing a carbon price on imports from countries without a similar carbon pricing system. This could be seen as a "punishment" or "penalty" for countries that do not have a comparable carbon pricing system, in order to discourage them from free-riding on the EU's efforts to reduce carbon emissions.
From the perspective of countries that do not have a carbon pricing system, the CBAM represents a "threat" to their exports to the EU. They may respond to this threat by implementing their own carbon pricing system, or by taking countermeasures such as tariffs or other trade barriers to protect their own domestic producers.
The outcome of this game will depend on the specific details of the CBAM and how it is implemented, as well as the responses of other countries. It could lead to a "race to the top" in which countries implement their own carbon pricing systems in order to avoid the penalties of the CBAM, or it could lead to trade tensions and a "prisoner's dilemma" in which both sides end up worse off. In this scenario, other countries may respond to the threat of CBAM penalties by taking countermeasures such as tariffs or other trade barriers to protect their own domestic producers. This could lead to a trade war, in which both sides end up worse off as trade is restricted and costs of goods increase.
Additionally, since the CBAM is still under development, it's not clear yet how it will be implemented and what will be the exact penalties, thus the decision of other countries to implement their own carbon pricing system or not is still uncertain, but it will depend on the specifics of the CBAM and the cost of implementing a carbon pricing system for these countries.
In a prisoner's dilemma, both sides may believe that the best outcome would be for the other side to make the first move, but if both sides hold out, neither side gets the best outcome. In this case, both sides may be worse off if neither implements a carbon pricing system and both face penalties from the CBAM.
Given the fact thet EU is likely to make the first move, the more likely scenario is other countries coming up with their own versions of CBAM.
CBAM: A Systems Thinking Perspective
From a systems thinking perspective, the European Union's (EU) implementation of a carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) can be understood as a change in one part of the global trade and carbon systems that can have ripple effects throughout the entire system.
The EU's decision to implement a CBAM can be seen as an attempt to address the issue of carbon leakage, where companies move their production to countries without a similar carbon pricing system in order to avoid the costs of carbon pricing.
By placing a carbon price on imports from these countries, the EU hopes to level the playing field for domestic producers and encourage other countries to implement their own carbon pricing systems.
However, this decision could also have unintended consequences on the global trade and carbon systems. For example, other countries may respond to the CBAM by implementing trade barriers or other countermeasures, which could lead to a trade war and decrease in trade. Additionally, if other countries do not implement their own carbon pricing systems, the CBAM may simply shift carbon-intensive production to other countries rather than reducing it overall.
Furthermore, since the EU is a big market and trade partner for other countries, the CBAM could also have a significant impact on the industries in those countries, particularly in developing countries, which could lead to economic hardship and job losses.
Additionally, the CBAM, as a single policy, may not be enough to address the global carbon problem, but it is a piece of a bigger puzzle. The EU's CBAM should be seen as part of a larger, integrated approach that includes not only carbon pricing but also investment in low-carbon technologies and infrastructure, as well as policies to support the transition to a low-carbon economy.
CBAM: Behavioral Economics Perspective
The EU's CBAM can be seen as an attempt to use the power of price signals and social norms to influence the behavior of companies and countries in order to reduce carbon emissions.
The CBAM creates a financial incentive for companies to reduce their carbon emissions by increasing the cost of imports from countries without a similar carbon pricing system. This can be seen as a "nudge" that encourages companies to adopt low-carbon production methods in order to avoid the penalties of the CBAM. Additionally, the CBAM also aligns with the growing public consciousness and consumer preferences towards products that align with their values, particularly in regards to climate responsibility, rather than just the cheapest option.
However, the CBAM alone may not be enough to change behavior, as there are other factors that can influence decision-making, such as lack of information, lack of awareness and lack of trust on the policy.
Impact on Trade with India
The imposition of a CBAM on imports from countries without a similar carbon pricing system, such as India, could lead to higher costs for those products, making them less competitive in the EU market. This could result in reduced exports of such products from India to the EU.
India has not yet implemented a carbon pricing system, so Indian producers would be at a disadvantage as compared to their EU counterparts. Indian producers may have to bear the additional costs of carbon pricing, which could make their products less competitive in the international market, resulting in decreased exports and potential job losses. It could also lead to increased energy costs for Indian industry and consumers, which could affect the economic growth.
However, it is likely that India could implement its own carbon pricing system in response to the EU's CBAM, which would help level the playing field for Indian producers.
In a joint statement, Brazil, South Africa, India, and China criticized the EU's proposal as "discriminatory" and contrary to equity and "Common but Differentiated Responsibilities and Respective Capabilities" (CBDR-RC).
The EU has been a significant market for Indian exports, receiving nearly 17% of total Indian exports from 2012 to 2021. The proposed Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) by the EU, if implemented, could potentially impact around 6% of these exports. The iron and steel sector, followed by the aluminium sector, will be the most affected by the CBAM among Indian exports. If the CBAM is expanded, it could potentially cover other sectors such as organic chemicals, plastics, polymers and hydrogen, eventually targeting almost all carbon intensive sectors.
By proactively embracing low carbon methods, businesses can drive sustainable and robust growth. Increasing awareness among consumers is shifting their preferences towards products that align with their values, particularly in regards to climate responsibility, rather than just the cheapest option. This is leading to a competition to meet these values, creating an incentive to adopt low carbon pathways.
Comentarios